Again ;DCoronation Street came calling.
How could Billy have gone to school with Clegg and Truly?
I meant he was over 15 years their juniorHow could Billy have gone to school with Clegg and Truly?
By Bus, Bike or on foot presumably.....
I know what you meant! ;DI meant he was over 15 years their juniorHow could Billy have gone to school with Clegg and Truly?
By Bus, Bike or on foot presumably.....
thought so,just thought i'd clarifyI know what you meant! ;DI meant he was over 15 years their juniorHow could Billy have gone to school with Clegg and Truly?
By Bus, Bike or on foot presumably.....
I never really warmed to the Hardcastle character. Esp. at first when he came on the scene, he seemed too much like a genuine nut-case. All of his "I am Robin Hood" schtick seemed to be the rantings of an escaped mental patient. Why not have another character who claims to be Napoleon? Too nutty.
I never really warmed to the Hardcastle character. Esp. at first when he came on the scene, he seemed too much like a genuine nut-case. All of his "I am Robin Hood" schtick seemed to be the rantings of an escaped mental patient. Why not have another character who claims to be Napoleon? Too nutty.
I think Billy was a true representative of the post-Compo era. The show was definitely different after Compo. If you liked Billy and his Robin Hood dellusions you probably liked that era of the show. If not, you are probably a traditionalist for the earlier years. I, for one, really liked Barry and that era. The silliness was what I got accustomed to seeing when I first started watching the show, approx. during Series 25.
To me, a lot of the newer Summer Wine characters were reincarnations of the older ones. For example, Smiler played a role similar to Wally. Truly didn't have quite the clutzy delusions of Foggy and his "military skill" so I think Clarke used the Robin Hood ancestory (archery skills included) to fill the void.
As to the comments about being not being the same age of Truly and Clegg, I always thought it would have been appropriate if they simply died Keith Clifford's hair white, and then the trio would have seemed a little more natural.
I have similar feelings.I never really warmed to the Hardcastle character. Esp. at first when he came on the scene, he seemed too much like a genuine nut-case. All of his "I am Robin Hood" schtick seemed to be the rantings of an escaped mental patient. Why not have another character who claims to be Napoleon? Too nutty.
I think Billy was a true representative of the post-Compo era. The show was definitely different after Compo. If you liked Billy and his Robin Hood dellusions you probably liked that era of the show. If not, you are probably a traditionalist for the earlier years. I, for one, really liked Barry and that era. The silliness was what I got accustomed to seeing when I first started watching the show, approx. during Series 25.
To me, a lot of the newer Summer Wine characters were reincarnations of the older ones. For example, Smiler played a role similar to Wally. Truly didn't have quite the clutzy delusions of Foggy and his "military skill" so I think Clarke used the Robin Hood ancestory (archery skills included) to fill the void.
As to the comments about being not being the same age of Truly and Clegg, I always thought it would have been appropriate if they simply died Keith Clifford's hair white, and then the trio would have seemed a little more natural.