amos hames
Dedicated Member
Would be intrested to hear your thoughts on this subject.Two of my choices would be Sir Steve Redgrave for his five Olympic golds in five consecutive games and Muhammed Ali quite simply the greatest
Trouble is mate this debate could run and run. I've been watching cricket since around 1955 and have seen greats , characters and might have beens. Your three picks are / were brilliant and deserve to be up there! I am a big fan of Graham Swann , but will he ever match Warney??Same with Stuart Broad but will he ever be up there?So as I say it could run and runI love watching old Cricket Dick, ESPN classic channel has some on now and again, it's marvellous.
Gilchrist was a brilliant entertainer and worth the entrance fee to see him bat.
I still stand by my judgement.
Richards, Lillee and Warne were the greatest exponents of their art that I've ever seen.
Trouble is mate this debate could run and run. I've been watching cricket since around 1955 and have seen greats , characters and might have beens. Your three picks are / were brilliant and deserve to be up there! I am a big fan of Graham Swann , but will he ever match Warney??Same with Stuart Broad but will he ever be up there?So as I say it could run and runI love watching old Cricket Dick, ESPN classic channel has some on now and again, it's marvellous.
Gilchrist was a brilliant entertainer and worth the entrance fee to see him bat.
I still stand by my judgement.
Richards, Lillee and Warne were the greatest exponents of their art that I've ever seen.![]()
Just two instances spring straight to mind, Samit Patel was stopped from playing tests because of his weight and general fitness.Colin Milburn in the 60s was overweight but boy could he hit a ball!! Even with his one eye! My own county has/had the greatest technical wicketkeeper in the country but his batting was suspect. So the powers that be decided he was surplus to requirements and instead of giving him batting coaching ,they tried to improve a good batsman's wicketkeeping!Since losing his England place Chris Read has gone on to be top scorer in a lot of Notts matches(another what might have been!) Joel Garner was a fearsome bowler , but not as good as Malcolm Marshall. I'm stopping this before it becomes "My Life As a TV Cricket Viewer "
I could talk Cricket and Boxing all day long.
The best bowler i ever saw must be Curtly Ambrose, what a bowler he was. He got over 400 test wickets at 20.99! Him and Courtney Walsh were as good an attack the Windies ever had.
I love my cricket but its just not the same without a strong West Indies team.
I could talk Cricket and Boxing all day long.
I could talk about shoe repairers but people say I talk cobblers
The best bowler i ever saw must be Curtly Ambrose, what a bowler he was. He got over 400 test wickets at 20.99! Him and Courtney Walsh were as good an attack the Windies ever had.
I love my cricket but its just not the same without a strong West Indies team.
James, that attack cant be faulted mate, but they played many more Tests than predeccesors and on different pitches. Not that I'm decrying the achievements of Walsh and Ambrose as test bowlers, but Marshall, Holding and Garner were better for me and I saw both contemporaneously.
You re spot on about a strong West Indies team though. The world of Cricket just isnt the same.
I'm right in thinking arent I mate, that we had a discussion about the Fire in Babylon docu a few weeks ago? It was you wasn't it?