Pearl and Howard kissed and cuddled..we know. Also, even if that's as far as the physical connection went. It was too far. Howard was married to Pearl. They weren't playing house together. Vows had been taken and agreed to. I'm pretty sure they didn't include implied (or direct) permission to step out on his wife anytime he felt a "magnetic attraction" to someone else. What he was doing is called 'comitting adultery'. Adultery by omission of completion of the physical is still adultery. He spent all of his free time with this "other" woman. Pearl only got to be with him when she was desperately trying to keep him home. And, of course, when he was there, he was miserable that she wouldn't be good sport enough to let him run around on her. That's what Pearl had to look forward to for years. No conversation..no fun. Yet, she kept trying. She kept the steak and kidney pie (that he loved) on the table every Tuesday. The steak and kidney pie that he did her the favor of "being there for" every week. As she said once to the girls at coffee morning, "You get them to retirement age, you think they'll settle down." So after years of Howard's fillandering..she thought she'd get a break and there'd be just the two of them. But oh-hh-h no-o. He had to go and find one last pathetic creature...er-r...hoorah..for his Summerwine years.True. I'm not sure that was the indication when the characters were introduced, but at a certain point it was made clear nothing was actually going on. It leads to another possible question for posterity. Despite the show's depiction as a sleepy backwater (especially by detractors) we all know the 70's were a time of social unrest and angst. How much did that affect the development of the program? At which point did the powers that be step in and say you can't show people smoking, you can't say that, or you can't do that in front of the children, which in the 70's seemed to be staying up awfully late if they were watching some of the things they were censoring. I have read that Howard and Marina were actually the favorite characters of many children, I'm sure attracted by Howard's endless inventiveness trying to evade Pearl. I wonder if the BBC or whatever watchdog was in charge of such things said, we have a responsibility to these young viewers, make clear it's harmless, or was it a decision by the director, or how much leeway did an actor have in saying, I don't like this about my character, can we change it?
Not just in the matter of Howard and Marina. Several of the characters are first introduced with a host of eccentric traits that disappear or morph slightly, sometimes within a few episodes. Tom had the least smooth entry into a program I have ever seen. Were there problems with code - the BBC objecting to moral/social situations, was Clarke just feeling his way until things settled, or did the actors have misgivings and request a character tweak?
Last edited: